Wednesday, December 27, 2017

Tax Law; Change # 01





"However, for churches who are struggling with giving, losing the deductability for gifts is going to hurt. It is also going to hurt food shelves, homeless shelters, just about every non-profit you can think of."



Many are thinking once the new tax law hits the street and folks start to see the consequences of it (both intended and unintended), that the first major change to the law might be forthcoming sooner rather than later. I am one of those people. However the change which I think will be forthcoming is not what some might think. Since I live in high SALT territory, some might think that would be the change. However - I think not.

Wait a minute Bird! All you have done is gripe about the SALT issue on the tax bill! What is wrong with you? Nothing. I still don't like it, as the minions in this state will be on the short end of the stick. But I also believe that the folks who live in low SALT states are not getting the same treatment from the feds that high SALT states have been given. So grudgingly, I accept that provision. 

Also, I have heard many folks much smarter than I, say this change is needed so the people in the high SALT states can fix their out of control tax system. I know we sure do. I think even the bluest statist will squeal like a pig when he or she sees what happens to his or her taxes this year, if he or she continues to itemize.

No, the first change will come from elsewhere. Where elsewhere? The deductability of charitable deductions. If you don't think a whole lot of people are motivated (at least partly) by the deduction of giving, well, you might need a winter vacation. And by the way, statistics prove this out. Did you know that 13% of all charitable giving happens in the last three days of the calendar year? Coincidence? Probably not.

Here is the irony. Back in the day, when after retirement I dabbled in the church business, giving was a big problem year after year. Lutherans are notoriously low givers, no matter which denomination you are talking about. As I was mulling this one day, a thought came to me. Why is it so low, if the monies given are deductible on the income tax? Then it hit me - the deduction was not high enough. It should be a tax credit. If we gave people the choice of giving 10% to the church or 10% to the government, the churches would do very well, thank you. However, there are folks who don't believe in the church. They can continue to give that 10% to the government. Everybody wins.

One day, a few of us staff members at the large church I worked at did a "what if" exercise if during the next year, 10% of the congregation tithed. It was fantastic. The church would be paid off, the amount of missions the church could fund would multiply, and much needed church improvements could be funded. 

However, for churches who are struggling with giving, losing the deductability for gifts is going to hurt. It is also going to hurt food shelves, homeless shelters, just about every non-profit you can think of. There will be a loud cry of anguish coming from the churches and non-profit world.

How loud will the cry be? It will be loud enough to be hear all the way to Washington. And that will begin the first change to this historic tax law.  

7 comments:

  1. Not enough lobbyists for this law to change.
    Charitable giving tax deduction has always been a bad idea.
    Reducing ones tax burden by donating money is NOT charity, it is a business decision.
    If the need is real and the cause is just, the money will keep coming.
    Forget the missions.
    We have seen how 45 feels about the UN, whose primary humanitarian focus these days in mission work in the countries ravished by war, famine, etc.
    So it was included in US tax policy. Big whoops.
    Hope you're staying warm. Millions of street people in the US are not able too, some dying. Not the GOP's problem, right?
    Here in AZ, the flu bug hit our house, wife in hospital a few days just trying to breath, I've dodged it so far, but the next few days will tell.
    Happy New Year,
    Dave

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My best to your wife David. Tell her to heal quickly!

      Delete
  2. I think you are wrong. If it were a tax CREDIT being taken away, absolutely. But if I give a dollar to charity just to save 15 cents on my taxes, I'm probably not smart enough to have that many dollars to begin with. As I understand the tax bill, charity will still be deductible, it's just that most people won't claim enough to even bother to itemize, with the doubling of the standard exemption, so charitable giving might even INCREASE, as people get to keep more of their money away from Uncle. Most people I know give because they want to, and the really big donors are the ones that the charities worry about.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tax reform will reduce incentives for charitable giving. These reforms include reductions in marginal tax rates, caps on total itemized deductions, caps on the maximum tax rate at which all itemized deductions can be allowed, increases to the standard deduction or reductions in other itemized deductions, and elimination or reduction of the estate tax.

      Delete
  3. Thousands of mortgages are written each year, with the interest deduction playing a large part in those decisions. People obviously aren't as smart as you.
    Think of all of the non-wage earning seniors who won't see a pay stub improvement in their finances. Will they continue to give a current rates? Doubtful.
    .


    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 45 is “unorthodox” because he doesn’t know anything.
    Contrary to what some in the media would like to believe, there is no doctrine or approach, just whatever 45 feels like saying or doing at any given moment.
    45 isn’t unpredictable or inward-looking, but rather completely clueless and unwilling to learn.

    ReplyDelete