Killing babies

"So long as Democrats worship at the alter of Margaret Sanger, so long as they don't see abortion as infanticide, this war will continue. War? Yes, the war for the rights of the unborn."

Wow. Rough title this morning. But poignant, never the less. Why is that? Because this is what it is all about. It is not about Brett Kavanaugh, per se. It is not about how much he drank as a kid, what age he started drinking, if he went to parties, how many years he remained a virgin, or even if as a teenager, if he took some liberties with a teenage girl. This is about none of that.

We saw from the Bill Clinton era, Democrats don't give a tinker's dam about sex, consensual or not. Clinton got away with all kinds of sexual shenanigans for one reason only - abortion. In other words, the killing of babies. Clinton was pro-abortion, and that is all that matters. 

Clinton is still revered by females on the Left. For what? For how he stood for Roe v Wade. I mean, he is still like a rock star. One gal from the Left said this about Clinton once he was outed due to a stain on a dress - "I would b**w him too, just to thank him for sticking up for a woman's right to choose." And what does that mean? The word "choose"?

It means the right for a woman to kill her baby. Legally. And Roe v Wade is seen by many on the Left as being the linchpin to keeping that right. Kavanaugh was not to be trusted on Roe. Regardless of what he said during his confirmation hearings, he was not to be trusted. Once he got on the High Court, he could flip. He could do like Sotomayer or Kagan did - go back on what they promised during their Senate hearings. So Kavanaugh had to be taken out - at any cost. In fact, not only taken out, but destroyed in the process.

But what would have happened if Trump had picked Judge Amy Coney Barrett instead? No matter. Obviously, the script would have had to change. Instead of being a teenage rapist, the Democrats would have found someone to swear he or she saw Barrett practicing witchcraft or something. Or she was a deep cover Commie. It would have been something damning or salacious enough to derail her confirmation. Why? She too, is a threat to Roe v Wade.

I remember a while back, someone asked me why Republicans care so much about abortions. It is mostly Democrats who abort their babies - not Republicans. Looking up the statistics, that appears to be correct. Then why do Republicans care so much? Because regardless of party, killing an innocent baby is wrong - dead wrong. Democrats can try to cow us with language like "woman's health issues", or "woman's reproductive rights", or just plain "choice". But at the end of the day, these are not tumors or lumps of flesh which are being ripped out of a woman's uterus. They are babies with heartbeats, fingerprints, and a developing brain.

So as long as Democrats worship at the alter of Margaret Sanger, so long as they don't see abortion as infanticide, this war will continue. War? Yes, the war for the rights of the unborn.

Judge Kavanaugh may or may not be a crusader for the rights of the unborn once he becomes Justice Kavanaugh. But it is simply not worth the risk. Therefore, he remains front and center, a target of the Left.