"We don't care what the term for these 'somethings' are. We don't care if they are called UAPs, UFOs, or USOs. But in each of those terms, the 'U' stands for 'unidentified'. That we would like to do, is have the 'unidentified' term cease."
What in the world is going on? Or some might ask, what outside our world is going on? Or, maybe the questions should be, what inside our world is going on? Whatever it is, it will all be part (as promised) of the forthcoming "disclosure". Disclosure of what, you might ask? Disclosure of what thousands, maybe millions have been seeing since 1947 in Roswell, New Mexico. Some might say, even earlier than that.
For those who are now tempted to change the channel, hold on for just for a minute. Some have seen a "something" which cannot be explained. My son-in-law and I saw a "something" on Thanksgiving eve in 2006. It was a huge triangle "something", rising out of the Mississippi River ,and then headed skyward. It was a sight our eyes could not believe. We were both interviewed by MUFON a few days after it was over. What was it? No clue. But it was in the water, and then headed straight up. MUFON said we definitely saw "something".
Want to go deeper? Did you know that Columbus and one of his crew, witnessed strange lights in the sky and the sea during his voyage? It is right in his journal - the night of October 11, 1492. What were they? Columbus had no clue - but he felt it was important to make note of this most unusual event.
Since we have only explored 5% of the world's oceans, is it not possible that these "somethings" people keep seeing might be coming from our oceans? The area right off our very southwestern coast, by Catalina Island, seems to be a hotbed of these "somethings". With a strong Navy presence in San Diego, don't you think the Navy knows a whole more about these "somethings" than they are letting on to?
It might be time for the government to put up, and not shut up. We can handle the truth. If we are alone in the universe, most might find that hard to believe, but we could deal with it. If have evidence we are NOT alone in the universe, tell us what the evidence is. We can deal with that also. AND - if our seas contain some kind of intelligent life form, which can control these amazing crafts which defy all aerodynamic logic, we can handle that. What we can't handle is this - being kept in the dark on this issue.
We don't care what the term for these "somethings" are. We don't care if they are called UAPs, UFOs, or USOs. But in each of those terms, the "U" stands for "unidentified". That we would like to do, is have the "unidentified" term cease. Tell us what they are, and what they mean to us. From there, we can go forward. Disclosure? Now is the time.
Reportedly the Columbus crew saw islanders' torches, & I note the date given is the night before they his the Bahamas.
ReplyDeleteAs for current mysteries, they could be as simple as programs running in the Matrix--though that may be an extreme assumption in itself!
There's no need for anything "alien" here. We already know that man has risen and fallen technologically several times in the past. Look how far we've come in the last 100-200 of our turn at bat. It wouldn't take much to believe that somebody might have made it 500-1000 years before seeing the next downfall coming, and got the heck out of Dodge. It seems a lot more plausible that these might be refugees coming back to check on the poor cousins who got left behind, rather than think that some incredibly advanced culture would trek eons across empty space to visit some planet covered in naked apes. But what about the stereotypical pasty white, skinny, big-eyed guys? Why can't they be human, too? We are already starting to tinker with our own DNA, so why wouldn't a space or deep sea dwelling group decide that they don't need so much calorie and oxygen guzzling bulk in zero-G, and could use bigger eyes to make use of low light? Again, it seems perfectly plausible, and really wouldn't require more than a couple hundred years of advancement beyond what we've already (publicly) got to work with.
ReplyDelete